Qt-interest Archive, March 2002
AW: A Survey on the QT Design Philosophy
Message 1 in thread
- Subject: AW: A Survey on the QT Design Philosophy
- From: Soukup Michael VA Mechatronics <Michael.Soukup@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:26:34 +0100
- Return-receipt-to: Soukup Michael VA Mechatronics <Michael.Soukup@vatron.com>
- To: qt-interest@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
And what does the link
List of all member functions
show, if not an alphabetically sorted list of the member functions?
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Michael Soukup
Messsysteme
em@il: mailto:michael.soukup@vatron.com
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Klaus Muth [mailto:muth@hagos.de]
Gesendet: Freitag, 22. März 2002 07:41
An: QT-Interest
Betreff: Re: A Survey on the QT Design Philosophy
Am Donnerstag, 21. März 2002 13:33 schrieb Mark Summerfield:
> I'm only commenting on the documentation point.
>
> On Wednesday 20 March 2002 21:33 pm, Mike Percy wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Documentation layout could use some work to. I know it comes from
> > doxygen, but finding a function in the list of member functions for
> > something like QString is a pain. Alphabetizing might be nice!
>
[...]
> We have had the alphabetizing argument many times, but it has always
> been lost against the argument for 'logical' ordering. Certainly our
> tool can produce alphabetical ordering. Many of our users are not native
> English speakers, so ordering by inheritance and importance may make
> more sense to some of them, whereas English alphabeticisation may appear
> arbitrary.
So use both! Where is the problem to insert lists of links in
any order you find appropriate at the end of the documentation?
klaus
--
[ signature omitted ]
