Qt-interest Archive, December 2007
QT Integration 1.3.3
Message 1 in thread
Hello,
I found in the interest news group the info, that QT-I 1.3.3 should not
be used any longer because of problems... I had this version downloaded
and could work with it, normally paying customers should get
notifications about problems with commercial software.... But nothing
happened execpt that the version 1.3.3 was no longer in my download
area. Now it is back, date is December 13th and size differs a little
from "older" version.
Still no notification, installation works, but I'm really angry about
the trolls !
No information at all, what the problems are, what is solved and what is
not.
The information politics should be much better, making mistakes is a
human being problem, but it should be documented !
Can anyone tell me, what is now with QT - I 1.3.3. Is this now the final
version and where can I see, what is fixed and what not ?
Regards from Germany
Peter
--
[ signature omitted ]
Message 2 in thread
Dear Peter,
On Dec 19, 2007, at 7:52 AM, peter wrote:
> Hello,
> I found in the interest news group the info, that QT-I 1.3.3 should
> not be used any longer because of problems... I had this version
> downloaded and could work with it, normally paying customers should
> get notifications about problems with commercial software.... But
> nothing happened execpt that the version 1.3.3 was no longer in my
> download area. Now it is back, date is December 13th and size
> differs a little from "older" version.
> Still no notification, installation works, but I'm really angry
> about the trolls !
> No information at all, what the problems are, what is solved and
> what is not.
> The information politics should be much better, making mistakes is a
> human being problem, but it should be documented !
>
> Can anyone tell me, what is now with QT - I 1.3.3. Is this now the
> final version and where can I see, what is fixed and what not ?
Your observations are correct, a new and updated version is provided
in commercial customers' download areas. If you downloaded the faulty
integration, you should have received an email explaining the failure
and with information about the new version's availability by the end
of last week. I'm very sorry if you did not receive this email.
Perhaps you could reply to me off-list with your account details so I
can investigate why you weren't emailed?
Kind regards,
Henrik
--
[ signature omitted ]
Message 3 in thread
> > Can anyone tell me, what is now with QT - I 1.3.3. Is this now the
> > final version and where can I see, what is fixed and what not ?
>
> Your observations are correct, a new and updated version is provided
> in commercial customers' download areas. If you downloaded
> the faulty
> integration, you should have received an email explaining the
> failure
> and with information about the new version's availability by the end
> of last week. I'm very sorry if you did not receive this email.
> Perhaps you could reply to me off-list with your account
> details so I
> can investigate why you weren't emailed?
I can only speak for myself, but i didn't download the faulty
integration because it was discussed on this list.
Yet i would have wanted to get informed about the re-release of a fixed
integration.
After i downloaded the fixed integration, i could only guess that it was
fixed (newer file date), but better information from TT would have been
good here.
Cheers,
Peter
P.S.
i would like to have a changelog for the integration, it seems to be
missing from http://trolltech.com/developer/notes/changes/changes-4.3.3
--
[ signature omitted ]
Message 4 in thread
Dear Peter, List,
On Dec 19, 2007, at 12:48 PM, Peter Prade wrote:
>>> Can anyone tell me, what is now with QT - I 1.3.3. Is this now the
>>> final version and where can I see, what is fixed and what not ?
>>
>> Your observations are correct, a new and updated version is provided
>> in commercial customers' download areas. If you downloaded
>> the faulty
>> integration, you should have received an email explaining the
>> failure
>> and with information about the new version's availability by the end
>> of last week. I'm very sorry if you did not receive this email.
>> Perhaps you could reply to me off-list with your account
>> details so I
>> can investigate why you weren't emailed?
>
> I can only speak for myself, but i didn't download the faulty
> integration because it was discussed on this list.
>
> Yet i would have wanted to get informed about the re-release of a
> fixed
> integration.
> After i downloaded the fixed integration, i could only guess that it
> was
> fixed (newer file date), but better information from TT would have
> been
> good here.
I agree the information around this has been far below par and that we
should have announced the fix once it was posted. We will take in your
comments and make sure this does not happen again. We are sorry for
the inconvenience and confusion this may have caused you.
> P.S.
> i would like to have a changelog for the integration, it seems to be
> missing from http://trolltech.com/developer/notes/changes/
> changes-4.3.3
The change log is installed along with the integration. Quoting it
here for your convenience;
The Qt Visual Studio Integration version 1.3.3 is a pure
bugfix release.
Changes
-------
- Ensured that moc steps of .cpp files are removed.
- Ensured moc steps are generated for every configuration when
there is only one output file.
- Prevented a Visual Studio crash that could occur when reloading
a .ui file.
- Ensured that a checkable group box is actually unchecked when
its checked property is set to false.
- Fixed the signal and slots connection functionality in the
form editor for the case where the form is used in the multiple
inheritance approach outlined in the Qt Designer manual.
Kind regards,
Henrik
--
[ signature omitted ]
Message 5 in thread
> - Ensured that moc steps of .cpp files are removed.
What does this line mean exactly?
--
[ signature omitted ]
Message 6 in thread
Henrik Hartz wrote:
> The change log is installed along with the integration.
Thanks! This has somehow escaped my attention ;-) Too bad it's nowhere
on the web.
I've been using the Tasktracker as a replacement for a changelog:
List of all the integration bugs that are marked for 4.3.3:
http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=advsearch&;
bugs=on&sugs=on&product=1&functionalarea=473&versionfixed=129
Duane Hebert asked:
> > - Ensured that moc steps of .cpp files are removed.
> What does this line mean exactly?
That's probably referring to a bug that i reported:
http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=1
82513
Cheers,
Peter
--
[ signature omitted ]
Message 7 in thread
Peter Prade wrote:
> Henrik Hartz wrote:
>> The change log is installed along with the integration.
>
> Thanks! This has somehow escaped my attention ;-) Too bad it's nowhere
> on the web.
>
> I've been using the Tasktracker as a replacement for a changelog:
> List of all the integration bugs that are marked for 4.3.3:
> http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=advsearch&;
> bugs=on&sugs=on&product=1&functionalarea=473&versionfixed=129
>
> Duane Hebert asked:
>>> - Ensured that moc steps of .cpp files are removed.
>> What does this line mean exactly?
>
> That's probably referring to a bug that i reported:
> http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=1
> 82513
Here's a tip: post long URLs with brackets around them:
<http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=advsearch&bugs=on&sugs=on&product=1&functionalarea=473&versionfixed=129>
<http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=182513>
Then they won't get wrapped in email clients (I use Thunderbird), which
breaks the links and requires multiple copy/pastes into a browser to use
the link.
--
[ signature omitted ]
Message 8 in thread
> Here's a tip: post long URLs with brackets around them:
>
> <http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=advsearch&bugs=on&sugs=on&product=1&functionalarea=473&versionfixed=129>
> <http://trolltech.com/developer/task-tracker/index_html?method=entry&id=182513>
>
> Then they won't get wrapped in email clients (I use Thunderbird), which
> breaks the links and requires multiple copy/pastes into a browser to use
> the link.
Or use http://tinyurl.com
--
[ signature omitted ]
